So, I'm assuming you ain't talking about the whole 90's, just towards the back end of it- because, HBK was good all through the 90's and that's the major difference from some of the people you have said. HBK is the best of all time, only really Flair can challenge him on that front as a performer, I believe. You don't earn the names "Main Event" "Show Stopper" "Mr. Wrestlemania" without having something about you.. Maybe your not a fan? Either way, you are wrong on this one.
Taz over HBK? You must be joking man Ha! I don't agree with you at all. You didn't even mention Taker, surprising.
HBK and Bret, carried the load when people were jumping ship for the money at WCW- Without them two, being as good as they were, who knows what would have happened to the WWE at them early stages.
I can see some points you made with Nash, or more importantly, Diesal during the early 90's and I was, still am, a fan of the guy but a beast? I don't know about that. Plus, without HBK, there is no Kevin Nash. In effect, HBK got him over too, when Diesal turned on him, went baby face, his reaction was good, again making your earlier point, very questionable as HBK was a good over heel, which made Diesal a good face to feud with. Plus, I could be wrong, didn't Nash struggle to draw money as WWE Champ?