Results 1 to 9 of 9

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    8,683
    Blog Entries
    62

    Lightbulb I Feel With All Logical Conclusion That THIS Will Be The WM XXVII Lineup!!

    MONEY IN THE BANK LADDER MATCH
    Alberto Del Rio
    John Morrison
    Big Show
    Wade Barrett
    Evan Bourne
    Rey Mysterio
    Drew McIntyre
    Jack Swagger
    Dolph Ziggler
    R-Truth

    WWE INTERCONTINENTAL CHAMPIONSHIP MATCH
    (c)Kofi Kingston VS. "Dashing" Cody Rhodes

    WWE DIVAS CHAMPIONSHIP MATCH
    (c)Natalya VS. Beth Phoenix

    Randy Orton VS. Chris Jericho

    UNITED STATES CHAMPIONSHIP MATCH
    Daniel Bryan VS. Tyson Kidd

    CM Punk VS. John Cena

    UnderTaker VS. Kane (Shawn Michaels Special Referee)

    WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP MATCH
    (c)Edge VS. Christian

    WWE CHAMPIONSHIP MATCH
    (c)Triple H VS. The Miz VS. Sheamus

    I have my reasoning for all of them. Starting with MiTB... Ziggler will be involved due to losing at Rumble and losing at Elimination Chamber as well. The others are there because they have no strong feud going or their feud isn't strong enough for its own match yet.

    IC Strap, c'mon. You know it's gonna happen. Why else would Kingston have it again 3 months before Mania?

    Divas... Either it'll be a friendly competition or one of them is turning heel in February.

    Jericho will be WAY more than ready to come back before them. He may be the reason Orton loses at Elimination Chamber.

    Dunno about this one but, it seems logical as hell. They've been pushing both of them and they ARE part of the youth movement so, we'll see.

    Punk/Cena = Duh.

    Taker/Kane = Duh. (Not too sure on Michaels, although that would be grand.)

    E&C.... Yup. He'll lose Rumble, win a match against Del Rio at Elimination Chamber and be the #1 contender, forcing Del Rio to compete in and possibly win MiTB setting up a Del Rio, Edge, Christian thing.

    WWE Champ.... I see this happening at Elimination Chamber. Miz loses the strap so we figure Sheamus (who in my mind is winning the Rumble) and Trips are gonna battle it out for the WWE Strap but Miz throws his hat in due to the rematch clause and they take it to Mania.

    Do I know who's gonna win these matches? Not yet. We're still too far away to tell. But, I think this is a VERY logical WM XXVII card. You?

  2. #2
    Black Ninja! The Brown One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Auckland, NewZealand
    Posts
    8,521
    Blog Entries
    4
    You bastard! I had the thought in my head a few hours ago of creating one of these! I was sitting on the toilet this morning, and realised that Wrestlemania needs to have like 9-10 matches that were good. And Kane vs Taker isn't good in my mind. But since Barrett might be feuding with Show, or the MITB, it looks plausible. Really good reasoning behind your entire card. Well done!

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    8,683
    Blog Entries
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by The Brown One View Post
    You bastard! I had the thought in my head a few hours ago of creating one of these! I was sitting on the toilet this morning, and realised that Wrestlemania needs to have like 9-10 matches that were good. And Kane vs Taker isn't good in my mind. But since Barrett might be feuding with Show, or the MITB, it looks plausible. Really good reasoning behind your entire card. Well done!
    The reason I picked Kane VS. Undertaker is because technically, they have "unfinished business". And in all technicality, so do Taker and Barrett. So in theory, you can switch the two up. I just don't see Barrett sans Nexus being that much of a draw for THE E' at The Grandest Stage.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    8,683
    Blog Entries
    62
    And thanks, it's taken me a while to make this card. I feel very strongly about it.

  5. #5
    Black Ninja! The Brown One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Auckland, NewZealand
    Posts
    8,521
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Rated_R(ob)KO View Post
    The reason I picked Kane VS. Undertaker is because technically, they have "unfinished business". And in all technicality, so do Taker and Barrett. So in theory, you can switch the two up. I just don't see Barrett sans Nexus being that much of a draw for THE E' at The Grandest Stage.
    Yeah Nexus too had beef with Taker, not only Barrett. Good point.

  6. #6
    Maybe, because Undertaker has these injury problems, he could be in a wrestlemania tag match. Undertaker and Big Show vs Wade Barrett and Kane?

  7. #7
    Black Ninja Moderator Bodom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    16,957
    Then Wade Barrett can pin Big Show and run around gloating that he defeated Undertaker at Wrestlemania
    I'd rather have nothing than have a lie.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

© 2011 eWrestlingNews, All Rights Reserved.