Originally Posted by Peter Kaymakcian
Not to be a jerk or anything, but I love how you commented on someone else's post before you actually recognized mine. Anywho, I agree that all money in the bank winners go through this, but I feel it doesn't just sit right with me. As I said in my post, I am pretty sick of the "Money in the Bank" concept. While I love the matches to get the briefcase, I just feel it is a poor way to establish someone as a new world champion. Since 2008, we have had 9 new world champions: CM Punk, Jeff Hardy, Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, Christian, Mark Henry, Daniel Bryan, Sheamus and the Miz. (If you count Ziggler's title reign, I cry).
Anywho, 5/9 of these men won from cheap cash-ins. If we talk about CM Punk, I don't remember his first title run, I remember his most prominent one. With Orton, I remember his first one in 2004 that was a shock. A normal match with a new champion! When in the world does that happen now? Wouldn't it be shocking to see Wade Barrett beat Cena clean to win the title? Back to my point, I understand how most money in the bankers have lost alot before their title reign, but seriously, if Ziggler cashes in cheaply without any payback or build-up. If Ziggler wants to have the name of "Show-Off", have him defend it right away or challenge him to a later date. Ziggler shouldn't care since he is a show-off, he should just challenge with confidence.
Anways, I understand your points, but I just wanted one that would be different where Ziggler doesn't come out weak, but strong.