View Poll Results: What's YOUR Magic Number?

Voters
51. You may not vote on this poll
  • It should go back to 20.

    1 1.96%
  • Keep it at 30.

    30 58.82%
  • Increasing the number to 40 is the best option.

    19 37.25%
  • I have my own preference.

    1 1.96%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29
  1. #21
    30 is a good number. With that number if they play their cards right they can still feature a good combination of top guys, mid-carders, guys who are hardly on tv, and a few surprises. With 40 it seems like too much and who really wants to see guys like Ricardo and Hacksaw in the Rumble anyways?

  2. #22
    40. The more the merrier!

  3. #23
    Black Ninja! Cabers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Waterford, Ireland
    Posts
    5,255
    With the size of the current roster and to help all the talent get a payday from the Rumble it would be best to have it at 40.

  4. #24
    It should be 30. Can't understand the need to insert another 10 irrelevant wrestlers.

  5. #25
    I'd like it to go back to 20. Tag team wrestlers should NOT be in the rumble, nor should women, legends, announcers, or midgets because we all know that they aren't going to win it anyways. Narrow it down to 20 guys and leading up to the rumble there will be qualifying matches for each spot. Since there are 20 guys instead of 30, make the time between new participants a little longer.

  6. #26
    Black Ninja! HCollins-TNA1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    from West Virginia and lived in Virginia
    Posts
    9,007
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkside Ron Garvin View Post
    Fuck the Bullshit... 90 man, 3 ring mayhem!!! World War 3 baby - Put the WCW Brainchild into a WWE format and let them fuckers go to town!!!
    Personally favor 30.....

    But the 90 man idea would be awesome if the WWE would do this... they have enough guys or can hire enough.... They have well over 100 guys including developmental and legends...
    We all judge others even if it isn't our place to judge, but supposedly at the end we are all judged by one!!!
    Wrestling, women and money who could ask for more???

  7. #27
    Super Member Rockstar83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Where Ever I Am Currently
    Posts
    665
    20 is to less and 40 is to more. so...

    I get that Big E Langston dropped the NXT CHAMPIONSHIP
    but....to Bo Dallas out of all people? WTF!

  8. #28
    Black Ninja! bearkg88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    9,643
    Blog Entries
    102
    I like the idea of keeping it to 30. To me it gives an adequate amount of time then for other matches on the card, and also doesn't bog down the rumble with superstars people don't care much about, aka fillers. I mean, I'm all for the occasional superstar that doesn't normally get featured, but let's be serious. When you see Yoshi Tatsu or Mason Ryan come to the Rumble match and enter it, you don't expect them to win.
     

  9. #29
    The Trinity steveorton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Trinidad.
    Posts
    2,836
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thirty 30.....
    I'm jus sayin...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

© 2011 eWrestlingNews, All Rights Reserved.