Originally Posted by CM Undertaker
How do you know how long Orton's out for? They already started his heel turn before he got injured, so it's not at all inconceivable that he'll be back as a heel and win the WHC straight off.
I don't think that Cena or Orton should be winning the Rumble either, but what either of us think is irrelevant. It's about what's likely to happen, and at this point, having either Cena or indeed Orton winning the Rumble is likely, whether we like it or not.
I'm just saying what I THINK WILL happen, not what I'd LIKE to happen. At this point, Cena vs Cesaro isn't at all likely to happen at Wrestlemania.
And ALL those viewers won't leave with The Rock, that's silly. Some might see other stuff they like while watching a show with The Rock on it and decide they want to keep watching. And the point is, The Rock will be drawing in all these viewers during the busiest period of the year for WWE, and he'll be drawing more ticket sales and buys for their most expensive ppv of the year.
Again, having Taker beating Punk for the title is a stupid move. It should be someone young that takes the title off Punk so that that person gets the rub of winning the title and gets the rub of ending a year+ reign.
If Punk vs Taker is going to happen at Wrestlemania, then the title shouldn't be on the line for it.