Originally Posted by Krysys
About the only champion in the WWE who could do a good job vs Roode is CM Punk. Sheamus is a good big man, but doesn't really wrestle and has to be brought up by Daniel Bryan.
Sting can still go and put on a decent match. So him losing to Roode is probably more believable than say, Flair beating Roode or Hogan beating Roode.
Either way, I like the WWE story lines more. They get an A+ there. TNA gets a D. WWE gets a B in wrestling, TNA gets an A+. So WWE right now is better.
Why is it hard to believe that a WWE fan can be a TNA fan too. It seems as if you have to be a fan of one and not the other.