the more fans a wrestling company has shows whether they are a success or not. For example, WWE had about 80,000+ fans at wrestlemania. their biggest ppv of the year. TNA had about 5,000 or less fans at their biggest ppv. If you have 80,000+ people watching something than that proves that its better than its competition.
the ammount of fans a company has does not show what show is better, it shows how much money they have to promote their product to get noticed by people. that's how you get a foundation of fans. given the fact that your putting on the best show possible to keep those fans coming back to watch next week. if a company puts on top of the line shows week after week, the fans that watch will get other fans to watch, thus, creating a chain reaction and fan growth.
fan 1 or fan 2, who's right?