First of all, none of the below IMO should break the streak. The streak should remain intact until Taker retires IMO.
Originally Posted by TheMiz
Personally, I think John Cena should be Taker's last ever opponent. It's the ultimate match at this point for Taker, in that can the WWE's crown jewel of the past decade; superman Cena beat the streak?
2. Brock Lesnar
-Well its almost the same history as cena.. i believe if he hadnt left in 2003, he would've problaby have faced taker somewhere in time, the reason i dont want this match to happen is that we would OBVIOUSLY know the outcome.
While I REALLY want to see this match, and I hope that they go with Taker vs Lesnar for Wrestlemania 30, I do really worry for Taker's health in this match. Everybody knows how intense Lesnar is in the ring, remember how he was vs HHH? He was popping HHH with suplexes left right and centre and throwing him around with ease, making HHH seem like a 200lbs guy. A straight up one on one match would have to be done here, since I think adding any kind of stipulation would only add to the concerns of Taker getting really hurt here. But this match is money.
- i Hear people saying ryback... but why? first of all, i dont think a loss vs undertaker would help him that much, and him beating the streak dont think so.. it surely would push him, specially as a heel, but i dont see it...
4. The Rock
- One of the Biggest matches ever, that never happened... could it be this year? maybe.. but i dont see rock losing 2 wrestlemanias in a row, Would THE PEOPLE be pissed if THE PEOPES CHAMP broke the streak? maybe not as much as if it was some1 else.. but still Cant see it happening..
This is another money match, but one that's a long shot I think. All reports say that The Rock is done in the ring, and I wouldn't disagree with that to be honest.
I can see The Rock being involved at Wrestlemania 30, but I don't see him wrestling.
10, even 5 years ago maybe, then this match would have been THE match. Now, not so much. Taker needs someone in the ring with him that can carry the match (like HHH, Punk have done in previous years), and at this point, Sting is also now in a position where he needs to be in the ring with someone that can ado all the work in his matches. So when you have two guys like that in the ring, it doesn't make a great match. So at this point, I'd have to decline a Sting vs Taker match, the ship has sailed to me. I just can't see Taker and Sting going at it for 20 minutes and putting on a Wrestlemania main event standard match.
Now i thought of Sheamus, Daniel bryan, Roman Reigns, Bray wyatt, etc.. but AT WRESTLEMANIA 30, i dont see any of these guys , Making the streak match seem that big, so im sure itl be one of the above 5... what you guys think?
You can maybe replace Ryback on your list with Goldberg, and those would be the only matches I'd be interested in seeing at this point. Those to me are the only money matches left for WWE to do with Taker.
IF they want to break the streak, then it has to be a young up and coming guy that WWE are going to back to be perhaps their new face of the WWE in years to come. Is there such a guy that stands out as that man right now? Nope, not in my eyes.
However, WWE are backing a few guys right now, Roman Reigns, Big E Langston, and I think Cody Rhodes also has a shot at being the next poster boy of the company. So IF WWE wanted to break the streak, then someone like that should be the ones to do it.