No Recent Activity

5 Visitor Messages

  1. And again I did answer, where is the advertising? And when he did it for Fast 5, I don't blame him, if you're coming back anyway, it only take a few seconds to drop your movie in there. You honestly think those movies were because he came back to the WWE? You need to think again my friend. I'm 100% positive that Rock got the Fast 5 part way before returning. It was released in April, and a movie usually takes 6 months to a year or more to finish. So he had the part way before returning. I say his return is equally profitable. Creative watering down this feud is making the ratings go away. Oh and I'm pretty sure Journey 2 was a kiddie role. The Rock has become a huge star. He chooses to come back for his fans, obviously not doing it for free, no idiot would. But does he need it? No. He's been away for 8 years and living the celebrity lifestyle, do you think his money disappeared when he was making Fast 5? No.
  2. I think honestly the Rock misses the live crowd. And I would love to see where his career in film was lackluster. Maybe people didn't like him in movies like the Tooth Fairy but check what he made in them. Here...
    The Game Plan - 90,636,983.00
    Tooth Fairy - 60,020,099.00
    Race to Witch Mountain - 67,128,202.00
    Get Smart - 130,313,314.00
    Journey 2 - 76,645,453.00 (And it's still playing.)
    That's naming some of the bigger ones he did without "advertising" in WWE. And to make that many movies grossing over 60 million, I wouldn't call that lackluster. I don't remember him "advertising" Journey 2 once since coming back. The only two movies I ever remember him using WWE for was Scorpion King (Still active wrestler) and Fast 5. See you didn't read my post because I didn't say it was set in stone that that's why he didn't want to mention wrestling, I said that COULD have been the reason. Advertising Twitter? I'm pretty sure Vince is pushing the "mention twitter" idea through the roof.
  3. View Conversation
    I dont get you I was very respectful when I messaged you back, I dont see how you got that I misread your comment. I was just stating If the Rock is doing so well Why come back to the WWE. If he dont need the WWE then why come back?

    You claim The Rock is a proud man that didnt want anyone to say anything about his wrestling background cause he wanted to do it on his own and make his own name for himself so thats the reason he wouldnt mention his wrestling background and told everyone that acting was his first and only job... Then Why Come Back now? Why advertise your movies on Raw, If he wants to show he is his own man and dont need the WWE, Why advertise your Twitter and movies? you have yet to answer that
  4. View Conversation
    So you honestly think The Rock is doing this out of the goodness of his heart? your thought process is flawed. Rocks Movie Career has been lack luster and most of his Disney movie have been under performing.

    The Rock being on WWE got his twitter threw the roof. The reason John Cena and the Rock have so many followers is cause the feud they are in. People wanna see if they bad mouth each other, or what they say about each other.

    Just look at The Rocks career since comming back to WWE, Fast Five, Journey 2, GI Joe and Now hercules and a Michael Bay movie.... I say The Rocks return as done pretty well for himself.

    Since Rock has come back his career is booming big time with non kiddie roles in actual blockbuster movies.. WWE hasnt really made any huge diffrence in their business, The Rocks big Return at Survivor Series did very poorly...... Wrestlemania will do well cause of the dream match in the Rock and Cena not so much cause people well shell out $50 Dollars to see The Rock.
  5. View Conversation
    sorry I cant comment on the Blogs their is something going on with the system so ill just comment straight to you.

    So lets use your excuse, Lets say The Rock just did that cause he wants to prove he made it in acting without prowrestling. for 1 I dont know the bands you speak of and I cant say yes or no if they made it as far as they did without the creed name, cause I know nothing about it. But I do know that there is nooooo way Dwayne Johnson would of been in any movie without the WWE and without the WWE pushing his films in the begining. So for 1 The Rock didnt do it on his own name and talent and 2 if he really wanted to make it on his own without the WWE name then Why come back now? why mix the Dwayne Johnson and Rock thing now? Why use WWE to advertise your films now? Do you see that band doing Creed concerts and advertising their new bands CD's? No of course not.Your logic is flawed and dumb. You should think before you write.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 5 of 5
About Final_Silence

Basic Information

About Final_Silence
Favorite Wrestler(s):
Old Kane, Orton, The Rock


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
03-07-2012 01:15 PM
General Information
Last Activity
03-24-2012 07:10 PM
Join Date
View Final_Silence's Blog

Recent Entries

The last two of an ERA?

by Final_Silence on 02-21-2012 at 02:47 PM
Hey everybody, this is my first blog and I'd like to really just jump into it.

Let me first start off by saying this is about the so called "End of the Attitude ERA". And the ERA is defined roughly from 1996ish to 2001ish.

See all the talk of Undertaker and HHH being the last of their kind got me thinking. How are they defining "their kind", because the

Read More


© 2011 eWrestlingNews, All Rights Reserved.