Yes! Yes! Yes! The Raw Review (#YYYTRR)
by, 06-11-2013 at 03:51 PM (3592 Views)
Last week when I raved about the incredible Raw show WWE put on and how pumped I was to see what they would do with their ultimate crowd favourite, Daniel Bryan, I was truly expecting them to follow up that effort by leading into Payback with a bang.
Instead, my success at watching Raw on no more than four hours sleep since Sunday was a complete waste of time. The opening segment was, for lack of a better word, a failure (Iâ€™m a fan of a heel McMahon storyline as much as the next guy, but the â€œcorporate politicsâ€ were pathetic and laughable). The matches seemed to lack any real reason, with the only worthwhile contest being the Ring of Honor-inspired Daniel Bryan vs. Seth Rollins.
Now that my rant (potentially caused by my lack of sleep, admittedly) is over with, I will try to find something to analyse from this week.
I know I spent a lot of my time talking about Daniel Bryan last week, but he seems to be one of WWEâ€™s bigger projects right now. Iâ€™m bound to talk about the hot topics in WWE, and WWE expects their fans to do so. The whole point of Daniel Bryan being made to team with Randy Orton begs two questions of me, though:
1. Is what we saw on SmackDown truly the end of Team Hell No? and
2. What does WWE plan on doing with the inevitable defeat of this makeshift team at Payback?
I feel that I can answer both of these questions, but only because it seems like all of the signs are there for any fan to figure them out.
The end of Team Hell No was imminent from the very moment they lost their Tag Team Championship, due mostly to the fact that the team only survived because they were champions, and a semi-quiet split leaves WWE the option to throw them together at random times in the future. This is not the question I wanted to focus on in this section, however.
I want to look at the duo of Randy Orton and Daniel Bryan, and the fact that both are looking at an eventful 2013 after Payback.
I outlined last week that I hope to see the rise of Daniel Bryan in a push towards the WWE Championship on the way to SummerSlam, and WWE simply has to pull the trigger with a big moment over a superstar involved in the WWE title picture to make that happen. The real focus of this team is sure to be Randy Orton on Sunday. With fans calling for an Orton heel turn for so long now it seems impossible, WWE is trying to throw us a swerve. The only thing theyâ€™ve done wrong is promote the PPV with a trailer which, until Monday night, signalled that Orton still had a mean streak (it is a great promo for the PPV, I must say).
Now with the â€œaccidentalâ€ attack on Bryan in their six-man tag last week and the RKO delivered on SmackDown, accompanied with the option to screw Bryan out of the titles he wants back on PPV, an Orton heel turn seems all too possible.
Best of all, he can turn on Daniel Bryan whilst the limelight is on Goatface, the biggest crowd favourite WWE has right now.
Curtis Axel: the problems
The title of this section may suggest that I am not a fan of Curtis Axel, but in fact I am. I love his ability (based on what Iâ€™ve seen in the past), the look, the music, and the fact that Paul Heyman has taken him under his wing. I just dislike the way WWE is stereotyping the idea of being a â€œPaul Heyman guyâ€ as a notoriously bad thing.
Sure, Heyman has some failures under his belt (Matt Morgan is my initial thought), but for WWE to try and convince us that to be a Paul Heyman guy is a bad thing seems insulting. CM Punk ultimately coined the term â€œPaul Heyman guyâ€ in his infamous promo a couple of years back, and WWE is now using it regularly to promote the inevitable success of Axel.
This, to me, is a problem.
CM Punk and Brock Lesnar made their names by claiming to be â€œThe Best in the Worldâ€ and â€œThe Next Big Thingâ€ respectively, but there was never as much emphasis on being under Paul Heymanâ€™s wing as there is with Axel.
Also, Axel is yet to claim a clean victory. He may have chalked up three victories (in theory) over Triple H, a win versus Chris Jericho, and a defeat of John Cena, but those victories have been due to a succession of distractions and outside circumstances.
My point is that Axel is yet to show anybody that he is as good as Heymanâ€™s reputation would suggest. His inclusion in Sundayâ€™s Intercontinental Championship match also seems very rushed and should he (likely â€“ this match looks set to be another predictable result, along with the Tag Team, United States, and WWE Championship matches) win the title, WWE needs to take his storyline in a different and more convincing direction.
My initial excitement over Curtis Axel has slowly become an afterthought whilst watching Raw these past few weeks, and it shouldnâ€™t have. Successful Heyman guys have always had an immediate impact, and Axel is not quite making the same waves that his predecessors have.
Iâ€™m not looking for a carbon copy of Brock Lesnar or CM Punk, just something more interesting than a series of coincidental victories.
So this weekâ€™s Raw was yet another poor final show before a PPV, but I like to think there is always something to take from the WWE product.
This week that something was once again Daniel Bryan. The crowd, albeit a poor one, was only really interested in Bryan. I commend them for helping WWE to further realise that Bryan needs to be pushed very quickly, lest his momentum fizzle faster than the craze of â€œFandangoingâ€ once WWE got a hold of it.
I mentioned that a large number of this Sundayâ€™s matches seem like foregone conclusions, and whilst I stand by that I do look forward to Payback. Not only is it the return of CM Punk to the WWE after three months, but those very same predictable matches could be great viewing.
I leave you with a question regarding Curtis Axel â€“ which changes, if any, would you make to his current push up the WWE ladder?
Follow me on Twitter (@SpringerAJ) and leave me feedback using #YYYTRR.