Grattonâ€™s World of Wrestling: WWE, Hmm...
by, 11-15-2012 at 10:02 PM (2575 Views)
Raw, Smackdown and PPVâ€™s â€“ no matter the WWE programme at the moment, I find myself going into a state of â€˜hmm...â€™
As a Brit, I religiously record my weekly wrestling fix of Raw and Smackdown (and PPVâ€™s every month) because theyâ€™re on when we across the pond are soundly tucked up in bed. Usually, I canâ€™t wait to enjoy the feast thatâ€™s been recorded the night before â€“ I attempt to avoid social media (or use it as sparingly as possible) so as not to find out what happened.
Thatâ€™s usually the case. However, lately, things are a little different. There isnâ€™t really much happening thatâ€™s giving me much of a reason to put myself out to press the play button. I love it, donâ€™t get me wrong, but when Iâ€™m watching I find myself thinking about how much I can fast-forward (not including the mind-numbing amount of adverts) in order to get through it as quick as possible.
Raw is three-hours, and it has been for a little while now â€“ enough for creative to have got a grasp of the new schedule. Have they? Well, I think we all know the answer to that one. Itâ€™s far too long. It feels as though weâ€™re watching a poor PPV every week with Raw being the same length (apart from Wrestlemania).
As a result of Raw becoming three-hours, this sees Smackdown wrestlers (not that separate rosters really exist anymore) get more TV time, even involving all blue-brand promos and matches on Monday nights. This wouldnâ€™t be so bad if when it comes to Smackdown that literally half of the show wasnâ€™t used for showing what happened on Raw. I donâ€™t mind a quick recap, thatâ€™s fine, but replaying of whole segments? No. Itâ€™s boring, itâ€™s unneeded and itâ€™s time that could be used for something far more productive.
Iâ€™ll come back to Smackdown a little later in the post, for now Iâ€™ll carry on with Raw. Currently, the two main storylines are John Cena and AJâ€™s â€˜are they screwing or not?â€™ programme and the WWE title picture between Punk with Heyman, Ryback and (again) Cena.
Does anyone care if AJ and Cena did get it on? The only thing amusing about this is seeing how the two continue to dispute whatever evidence is thrown at them. I was convinced that after the hotel video evidence, Vickie Guerrero could have played a clip of Cena fingering AJ and Cena would have passed it off as a mere itch that his friend couldnâ€™t reach.
Seriously, this storyline doesnâ€™t have any relevance, because what happens if either is proved? If Cena and AJ are clean, will AJ be reinstated? Nope. If theyâ€™re found out, will AJ be fired from the company where Triple H is COO because he screwed the bossâ€™s daughter? No. My guess is that the story will go on that nothing was happening while AJ was GM and they get/got it on later.
Itâ€™s probably a good job itâ€™s PG, could you imagine the IWC discussing Cena in the sack? John Cena in the bedroom would be; has five moves, lets the other person do all the work and eventually finishes on top.
Let that thought sink in for a bit.
Right, letâ€™s move onto Smackdown.
I have always been a Smackdown guy. Over the years since the split, even though the blue-brand has never played out the high-profile stories, itâ€™s where talent has been used to showcase what they can do - solid matches and, to be fair, solid writing.
But now, I watch a two-hour episode in little more than 45-minutes after skipping all unnecessary segments. Adverts on their own can shorten the viewing time by a good 20-minutes, then replays from Raw are a sizeable chunk and most weeks, for some darn reason, there is a section called â€˜From The Vaultâ€™ where a â€˜classicâ€™ match is shown in near-entirety. Years this has annoyed me, YEARS! Whatâ€™s the point of it? If you want to watch old matches then go to WWE on demand or watch WWE Vintage, but donâ€™t use precious time on what was the better show that could so easily be used to build up one of the many unused talents hidden away in dark matches (DEAN AMBROSE).
When Iâ€™m skipping more than half the show, I find myself asking why I even bother anymore, why am I continuing to watch? And you know what; Iâ€™m struggling to answer it. Why am I watching Smackdown? Nothing happens. Yeah, Orton and Del Rio had a bit of a scrap, but it was shown on Raw (in a short bite-sized clip, might I add), so I wouldnâ€™t miss it.
Itâ€™s a good job that Kane and Bryan are still gold, other than them, the only other guys worth watching (that regularly appear on both shows) are Dolph Ziggler, Damien Sandow, The Miz and Wade Barrett. Thatâ€™s six people. Some may argue that Sheamus and Big Show deserve a mention â€“ well, thereâ€™s their mention. When youâ€™re going to only give me six guys worth watching on a programme that can easily be cut down to a 45-minute show due to Raw overkill, especially when I can see them on Raw anyway, donâ€™t be surprised if Iâ€™m not too upset if I miss the odd week here and there.
As for Raw, the answer is simple â€“ go back to two-hours. Oh, and need a new writer? HEYMANâ€™S RIGHT THERE.
â€˜Till next time.
Aaron Gratton (@ABGratton24)