WWE's Divas division unfairly treated?
by, 06-25-2012 at 02:09 AM (3281 Views)
I am writing this based on a request on Twitter. At first I was sceptical to tackle the subject of WWEâ€™s Divas division (due to my lack of interest in it in todayâ€™s WWE) but I decided it might be worth taking a crack at it.
It also came to my attention that my lack of interest and the occasional insult and comparison towards it might be useful tools in offering a sustainable argument as to why the divas are seemingly mistreated and almost irrelevant nowadays.
The main points Iâ€™m looking to mention are the fact that there is no such thing as an intriguing diva storyline, and the fact that the current crop of divas are very limited in terms of their in-ring work (or the work that weâ€™re allowed to see).
Lack of on-screen time
After something like three-five years, it seems like a moot point when I say that the reason the WWE divas get very little respect from myself and many other fans is that we donâ€™t get the chance to gain any respect for them. For as long as I can remember in the â€˜PG eraâ€™ (Iâ€™m not so sure this is the PG era anymore, so much as it is a slow revolution into pure wrestling just waiting for John Cena to step aside and let technicians have the main event spots) the divas are given all of five minutes to put on a decent match and show us why we should look to them for our womenâ€™s wrestling, and this includes the entrances.
I personally do not feel like Iâ€™m obligated to sit through yet another Beth Phoenix versus Layla match (whilst they have put on some great divas matches on recent pay-per-views, they simply do not get a chance to shine on Raw or SmackDown).
The main reason for this is the same as the reason why people are saying that Daniel Bryan versus CM Punk doesnâ€™t sell PPVs â€“ we see it week in/week out and therefore have no reason to pay for that privilege.
My point here is that the divas, as talented as they (potentially) are, do not get a chance to build any real intriguing rivalries for the fans to invest in. it is more likely that they are there to cater to the minority of female WWE fans, to fail to compete with the TNA Knockouts (the only area where TNA has any edge over the WWE product in my opinion), and to provide some eye candy for the male demographic.
Looks over ability
Whilst it is only a recent move in terms of moulding WWE, in-ring ability is becoming the greatest measuring stick in the company in terms of who holds the biggest titles (say what you will about Sheamus and him being a â€˜fighterâ€™ and not a wrestler, but he has in-ring ability) and who gets the biggest storylines with the most time.
It seems like this move has eclipsed the divas to the point where they have no real purpose. Kelly Kelly is the key example to this point. The fact that WWE chose to put her at the top of the mountain, overcoming Beth Phoenix and Natalya (two proven womenâ€™s wrestlers), was a nail in the coffin of the divas for me.
Whilst she is clearly an attractive woman (Iâ€™m pretty sure it is now a minimal requirement to be a diva today), her wrestling ability is limited. Whilst Trish Stratus (to me one of two of WWEâ€™s greatest divas along with Lita) was a terrible wrestler when she first stepped into the ring alongside T&A (thatâ€™s Test and Albert for those who missed the attitude era), she improved. This is something that I have failed to see from Kelly Kelly in her four-plus years with WWE, and if she has WWE hasnâ€™t allowed her the time to show us such improvements.
Comparisons to Trish Stratus and Lita
Iâ€™ll be the first to slate a current WWE diva for their lack of intrigue in comparison to the days of Trish and Lita, and I have no shame in it. I will admit that it is a harsh comparison to make, however.
The landscape of today and yesteryear are very different. Whilst Trish and Lita earned their way into an eventual Raw main event, they were allowed the time to build to an intriguing rivalry which eventually became the centrepiece of both divasâ€™ careers. On top of that, the limitations on what they could do to entice a predominantly male fan base were loose and occasionally non-existent â€“ Trish acting as a (lack of a better word) â€˜slutâ€™, and the infamous â€˜walking kiss of deathâ€™ are both things which I could no longer imagine a WWE diva doing today.
Whether that is a good or bad thing is all down to the individual, and considering the key audience is children now it is probably a good thing.
The WWE divas get a lot of criticism from me and others alike, but it is never without reason. WWE seems to treat the divas worse than they have the Tag Team Championships over the last three years, and for that the divas cannot be blamed. Whether it is limited TV time, the repetitive nature of the matches we do occasionally see, or the stigma that the current crop has in that they arenâ€™t as entertaining or interesting as the divas of old, the actual divas cannot be blamed.
Where I will place blame is on the lack of effort many of them have made to show us what they can do with the time they are given. There was once a time when superstars like Chris Jericho and Chris Benoit could barely get five minutes in the ring themselves, but they chose their best spots and grabbed that brass ring and eventually made it big. This is what the WWE divas need to do in order to be taken seriously in a toned-down WWE.
Where they are limited in character development, they need to show us what they can do technically.
Perhaps we are seeing a couple of divas do this in Layla and Beth Phoenix?
Thank you for reading this effort at a diva-themed blog, feel free to comment and share your thoughts.
Follow me on Twitter (@SpringerAJ) for more nonsensical views on WWE, and to request other topics you would like to read my views on.