A bonus blog - does Chris Jericho really deserve a suspension?
by, 05-29-2012 at 06:37 AM (3665 Views)
I know Iâ€™m not the first, and I wonâ€™t be the last, to blog on this topic. I am also well aware that this isnâ€™t the Attitude Era where anything goes and there are no consequences. The reason I am writing this is because I wanted to make a point about the way in which Jericho has conducted himself since his return and how this is the least offensive of his actions.
For those who donâ€™t already know, Jericho has been suspended for thirty days after denigrating the Brazilian flag by kicking it out of the ring in a promo with CM Punk during a show in Brazil. It doesnâ€™t sound like much, but apparently Brazilian fans have some trouble understanding that what happens in a WWE ring is all in character.
It sounds like an unwavering defence of Jerichoâ€™s actions on my part, but I assure you it is not. I understand that Brazilian culture puts the flag on a much higher pedestal than Canada or the UK does, and I get that Jericho deserves to be punished for pulling a standard heel move in the wrong country.
My point actually stems from Jerichoâ€™s feud with CM Punk.
All you have to do is look at the nature of that storyline and you can see that throwing a flag out of the ring is a far cry from how sinister Jerichoâ€™s heel character is this time around. In the four months that Jericho and Punk had their rivalry, it escalated from the innocent slogan of â€œbest in the world (at what I do)â€ to the point of Jericho â€˜forcingâ€™ Punk to abandon his straight edge lifestyle on screen. On top of this he (albeit in storyline and with Punkâ€™s permission) accused Punkâ€™s sister of being a drug addict and his father of being a recovering alcoholic.
And Jericho gets backlash from Brazilian fans for a flag incident?
Why on earth were there no rally cries from the straight edge community when Jericho broke a faux bottle of Jack Daniels on CM Punkâ€™s skull? And no backlash when Jericho made it more personal than any storyline had been in a great number of years?
It seems to me like WWE has been forced to clamp down on the most minor of behaviour, so long as it doesnâ€™t majorly effect one of their big storylines.
Another similar incident is the use of Randy Ortonâ€™s Punt Kick. A move which became known for the fact that it looked awesome and it took opponents out of action (in storyline), and WWE has banned it because it risks causing injury. Whilst WWE is right for banning a move which offers the superstar on the receiving end no defence, does it not mean that Undertakerâ€™s Tombstone Piledriver or Big Showâ€™s WMD would also be banned? One botched move from the superstar delivering the blow or the superstar on the receiving end can cause a major head injury. The only difference with Ortonâ€™s Punt is that the move was used in order to take superstars out in the first place. It is the exact move that Jericho left on in his last run with WWE.
The point Iâ€™m trying to make is that WWE needs to start picking its battles carefully otherwise they will have no roster to speak of. To suspend Jericho for a minor incident (in my eyes), where I would guess a very small portion of the WWE audience is based, for any amount of time seems ridiculous when you consider the things WWE does on to other nationsâ€™ flags whilst in the safe confines of the US.
The French flag, the British flag, and various others have all been victims of WWEâ€™s never-ending quest to be more patriotic to the US flag, but when Jericho makes one error in portraying his heel persona heâ€™s punished for it. I get that WWE has to do something to discipline his actions, but suspensions are usually reserved for the wellness policy. It seems to me that a simple apology on Jerichoâ€™s behalf would have been enough to put this issue to bed, but WWE seems to have other methods.
Pick your battles, WWE. Thatâ€™s my only advice.