PDA

View Full Version : Daniel Bryan is Molly Holly 2.0?



Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 09:56 PM
They're doing another one of these virginity angles? Seriously?

eyehatecena
01-17-2011, 10:25 PM
very fucking stupid...and how does this fit in with their PG rating? wouldn't anything dealing with sex be at least pg13? lol. Who writes this shit?

Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 10:29 PM
very fucking stupid...and how does this fit in with their PG rating? wouldn't anything dealing with sex be at least pg13? lol. Who writes this shit?
Discussing someone's virginity isn't going to affect a show's rating in any way. That terrible 7th Heaven show used to do that shit all of the time, and that show was aimed at church-going folk.

Bodom
01-17-2011, 10:34 PM
I just get home and you're telling me they're doing a virginity angle with Bryan?????

WHAT THE FUCK

eyehatecena
01-17-2011, 10:34 PM
Yeah, I know discussing it would not change the ratings- nor would any thing they have planned to move the angle along- I was just ranting.
But I am serious, who writes this shit? They better not make a joke out of Danielson.

Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 10:40 PM
I just get home and you're telling me they're doing a virginity angle with Bryan?????

WHAT THE FUCK
The Bella Twins have a bet going to see who can deflower him first. Yeah.

On the upside, he had a fun little match with Morrison tonight. Sure, he lost, but both of them still came out looking good.

eyehatecena
01-17-2011, 10:46 PM
Danielson can have a good match with anyone- win or lose- he always shines. At least Danielson will get to be working with two hot women for a lil longer- so I guess thats good, lol. Still, its a stupid angle

Bodom
01-17-2011, 10:46 PM
The Bella Twins have a bet going to see who can deflower him first. Yeah.

On the upside, he had a fun little match with Morrison tonight. Sure, he lost, but both of them still came out looking good.

At least he had a singles match this and against Morrison of all people. Have to check it out.

This angle reminds me of the Jericho/Christian angle with Trish & Lita. I guess the plus is Bryan bangs a Bella. Downside is the Bellas have already whored themselves to every guest host. *Tries to not think of the Bellas with Bob Barker*

Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 10:58 PM
Danielson can have a good match with anyone- win or lose- he always shines. At least Danielson will get to be working with two hot women for a lil longer- so I guess thats good, lol. Still, its a stupid angle
It's most surely a stupid angle, but it's kind of amusing, in a twisted sort of way, to see just how much of a nerd McMahon seems to think he is. I can only imagine the kind of things that Vince says behind the scenes. I imagine he carries on just like the gym teacher who has that one student whom he spends his time in the faculty lounge making fun of with the other teachers.

"Hey, Paul, did you hear about nancy pants on the plane? Sheamus told me that most of the guys got drunk and fell asleep, but brainiac stayed up reading a Cormac McCarthy novel while listening to Arcade Fire on his iPod Shuffle. I bet that kid has never touched a vagina.

That reminds me, get Gewirtz on the line."

The Brown One
01-17-2011, 11:02 PM
At least he had a singles match this and against Morrison of all people. Have to check it out.

This angle reminds me of the Jericho/Christian angle with Trish & Lita. I guess the plus is Bryan bangs a Bella. Downside is the Bellas have already whored themselves to every guest host. *Tries to not think of the Bellas with Bob Barker*

Bang a Bella. What a fascinating concept.

Bodom
01-17-2011, 11:04 PM
That reminds me, get Gewirtz on the line."

This shit reeks of Gerwitz

Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 11:06 PM
Bang a Bella. What a fascinating concept.
If they want to increase their PPV buys, I think naming one "Bang a Bella" would be a smart way to go.

Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 11:08 PM
This shit reeks of Gerwitz
Yeah, Gewirtz is ass.

jhorton1215
01-17-2011, 11:12 PM
Yeah, Gewirtz is ass.

Guess that makes Michael Hayes tits

Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 11:13 PM
Guess that makes Michael Hayes tits
Well, he is a bit of a boob.

Black Mass Reverend
01-17-2011, 11:25 PM
After watching that segment you guys were talking about, I'm pretty sure they meant that they wanted to be his first kiss on the lips. "Let's face it, anyone can kiss the pretty ones." is what I think I remember hearing one of the Bella's say. None the less, it's still a lame angle. Just happy Danielson's getting airtime.

thedominator92
01-17-2011, 11:27 PM
Maybe this is the start of the end of PG?

HHHBK
01-17-2011, 11:29 PM
Maybe this is the start of the end of PG?

PGs not going anywhere anytime soon

The Brown One
01-17-2011, 11:31 PM
If they want to increase their PPV buys, I think naming one "Bang a Bella" would be a smart way to go.

If they put those words into just one name, and said it faster, it would sound like a real name :P

Bodom
01-17-2011, 11:31 PM
You can say it's the end when you see the Bella's head's bopping up and down.

HHHBK
01-17-2011, 11:34 PM
Maybe he should wear some of that Mark Henry cologne..

SilverGhost
01-17-2011, 11:37 PM
Bodom....that match could have been more if you are going to watch it.

Bodom
01-17-2011, 11:44 PM
Bodom....that match could have been more if you are going to watch it.

Well you can't give everything away on free TV.

Read a recap of the show. Wonder if they might be working towards a Triple Threat for US Title. Bryan vs Morrison vs Sheamus?

The Brown One
01-17-2011, 11:49 PM
Well you can't give everything away on free TV.

Read a recap of the show. Wonder if they might be working towards a Triple Threat for US Title. Bryan vs Morrison vs Sheamus?

But it obviously won't happen at the Rumble, because all 3 will be in the Rumble match. At Elimination Chamber, at least Sheamus and Morrison will be in the EC match. If Trips isn't back by then, I'd say add Bryan to that match too.

Starscreamer
01-17-2011, 11:51 PM
I say we go Russo style with this and make it a Pole on a Pole match...

Iron Ape
01-17-2011, 11:51 PM
Maybe this is the start of the end of PG?
There's something in nearly every RAW broadcast that leads to someone making this very post. It happened last week, and it will happen again next week. And then the week after that. And more than likely the week that comes 365 days from now.

Bodom
01-17-2011, 11:55 PM
But it obviously won't happen at the Rumble, because all 3 will be in the Rumble match. At Elimination Chamber, at least Sheamus and Morrison will be in the EC match. If Trips isn't back by then, I'd say add Bryan to that match too.

Ofcourse not at the Rumble. But it's just a feeling.

Bodom
01-17-2011, 11:56 PM
I say we go Russo style with this and make it a Pole on a Pole match...

Condom on a Pole match.

thedominator92
01-18-2011, 12:28 AM
There's something in nearly every RAW broadcast that leads to someone making this very post. It happened last week, and it will happen again next week. And then the week after that. And more than likely the week that comes 365 days from now.

Because every week, Vince gets a little closer to his death bed, which will be the end of PG.

Iron Ape
01-18-2011, 12:31 AM
Because every week, Vince gets a little closer to his death bed, which will be the end of PG.
I don't really see Steph and Haitch not wanting all of that sweet merchandising and endorsement money, but you keep hope alive.

SilverGhost
01-18-2011, 12:33 AM
I say we go Russo style with this and make it a Pole on a Pole match...


Condom on a Pole match.

Condom on a Pole on a Pole match!

The Brown One
01-18-2011, 12:35 AM
Well they did have a viagra on a pole match once...

Wrestling_Deluxe_08
01-18-2011, 12:44 AM
I did not expect to see this on a PG show. Its been a while since we got a sex based storyline. WWE is really starting to push the limits of their PG rating and I got to say I like it very much thus far. For once, we have divas that are being utilized for something storyline wise. I could literally see one of the bellas stripping themselves in front of Daniel while he is training and trying to get his attention. Or perhaps even giving him a private lap dance.

Hey, as long as we get to see the bellas give us a taste of how the divas used to do things and express their sexuality, I am game for this storyline.

SilverGhost
01-18-2011, 12:45 AM
Well they did have a viagra on a pole match once...

Viagra and Condom boxes on a pole on a pole match and the winner gets the choose which Bella to spend the night with.

Iron Ape
01-18-2011, 12:56 AM
I'm not really sure why people are so surprised to see this storyline on a PG show. Seinfeld was a PG show, and nearly every episode involved some kind of sexual component. I mean, they had entire episodes dedicated to genital shrinkage and masturbation contests.

From wikipedia:


The TV-PG rating may be accompanied by one or more of the following sub-ratings:

* D for some suggestive dialogue
* L for infrequent coarse language
* S for some sexual situations
* V for moderate violence

No limits are being pushed at all, really.

Wrestling_Deluxe_08
01-18-2011, 01:43 AM
I'm not really sure why people are so surprised to see this storyline on a PG show. Seinfeld was a PG show, and nearly every episode involved some kind of sexual component. I mean, they had entire episodes dedicated to genital shrinkage and masturbation contests.

From wikipedia:



No limits are being pushed at all, really.
Well for one, I've never watched Seinfeld. Two, I was talking about the WWE was presenting themselves as a PG show. I never expected them to do something like this by what they've presented us over the past year as a PG product. I guess what I am saying is I like seeing them 'test new waters' as a PG product. There. How is that for you?

Sinliner
01-18-2011, 06:23 AM
I'm not really sure why people are so surprised to see this storyline on a PG show. Seinfeld was a PG show, and nearly every episode involved some kind of sexual component. I mean, they had entire episodes dedicated to genital shrinkage and masturbation contests.

From wikipedia:



No limits are being pushed at all, really.

Not a very good example iron ape (im surprised at you lol). WWE is a wrestling show which shows 2 hours of dudes trying to beat eachother up and is very violent, if you add sexual themes and anything else it will raise your tv rating. seinfeld didnt have that much violence most of the time and mostly just adult jokes. Im pretty sure a show with sex and violence is considered worse than a show with just sex (in the cable companys eyes atleast lol)

The Brown One
01-18-2011, 08:23 AM
Not a very good example iron ape (im surprised at you lol). WWE is a wrestling show which shows 2 hours of dudes trying to beat eachother up and is very violent, if you add sexual themes and anything else it will raise your tv rating. seinfeld didnt have that much violence most of the time and mostly just adult jokes. Im pretty sure a show with sex and violence is considered worse than a show with just sex (in the cable companys eyes atleast lol)

Its true. The hit comedy show Everybody Loves Raymond was rated PG, and there were sexual references every episode. Of course, Edge having a live sex celebration on Raw is far above that.

Rassling_Fan
01-18-2011, 08:59 AM
Is it even about sex? Maybe it's something else, like a double entendre.

Necroyeti
01-18-2011, 09:02 AM
"Horrific, deplorable violence is okay, as long as people don't say any naughty words."

Bodom
01-18-2011, 09:05 AM
Its true. The hit comedy show Everybody Loves Raymond was rated PG, and there were sexual references every episode. Of course, Edge having a live sex celebration on Raw is far above that.

Im not sure they were even PG then.

CobraNightviper
01-18-2011, 09:40 AM
speaking of Hayes does he still work for wwe?
Well, he is a bit of a boob.

Bodom
01-18-2011, 10:10 AM
Aye. Still the head writer for Smackdown.

Adam Bomb II
01-18-2011, 11:17 AM
I always have had a hard time understanding where the line goes for what is allright to show in not just wrestling, but in Tv and movies in general. Even though the blood and "household" weapons have been removed from WWE, don't little kids still think it is real? I know I did when I was little! My point I guess is, that as much as i love wrestling, it's still glorifying violence in some way... I didn't watch much wrestling in the attitude era of WWE, so I'm not sure how extreme the sexual contents of the show were back then, but i must admit that in general im more worried about the amount of violence shown on tv, compared to the sexual stuff.

Just realised I'm way off topic... I also hope that what i wrote made some sense - it's hard making a good point when english isnt your first language! :D

SaberToothTigerz
01-18-2011, 12:24 PM
PGs not going anywhere anytime soon

never will
so people stop getting ur hopes up

as for danielson bryan
i swear i couldnt hear the twins talking they just whisper to eachothers or make swine sounds

Iron Ape
01-18-2011, 12:24 PM
Not a very good example iron ape (im surprised at you lol). WWE is a wrestling show which shows 2 hours of dudes trying to beat eachother up and is very violent, if you add sexual themes and anything else it will raise your tv rating. seinfeld didnt have that much violence most of the time and mostly just adult jokes. Im pretty sure a show with sex and violence is considered worse than a show with just sex (in the cable companys eyes atleast lol)
2 hours of dudes pretending to beat each other up qualifies as the "moderate violence" that's permitted under the TV-PG banner. And I have a unique understanding of how this stuff works on account of having a job in television. So you thinking it's not a very good example is of no real consequence, as WWE added a sexual theme last night and it didn't change their rating in any way, completely nullifying whatever you're trying to get at here.

Starscreamer
01-18-2011, 01:14 PM
never will
so people stop getting ur hopes up

as for danielson bryan
i swear i couldnt hear the twins talking they just whisper to eachothers or make swine sounds

I dunno..while the match was going on...I was rooting for gravity in it's bout against the t-shirts off the shoulders....(camera almost got that perfect angle....grrrr)

hystrix
01-18-2011, 01:44 PM
Im not sure they were even PG then.

Those shows arn't PG. They are TV-14, which is the TV equivilent to PG-13...

SilverGhost
01-18-2011, 01:58 PM
"Horrific, deplorable violence is okay, as long as people don't say any naughty words."

LOL

Defeats the purpose of violence when you are in the zone.

Sinliner
01-19-2011, 04:02 AM
2 hours of dudes pretending to beat each other up qualifies as the "moderate violence" that's permitted under the TV-PG banner. And I have a unique understanding of how this stuff works on account of having a job in television. So you thinking it's not a very good example is of no real consequence, as WWE added a sexual theme last night and it didn't change their rating in any way, completely nullifying whatever you're trying to get at here.

i dont think they show the network the entire script before a show so how would they know to change the rating for just one episode? besides they wouldnt change the rating for just one 2 min segment lol, dont act like you know everything about t.v. just because you have a job there im sure its possible for you to be wrong on some occasions even in a situation involving your chosen profesion.

The Brown One
01-19-2011, 06:05 AM
Those shows arn't PG. They are TV-14, which is the TV equivilent to PG-13...

They are PG in Australia, and here in NZ.

Iron Ape
01-19-2011, 11:51 AM
i dont think they show the network the entire script before a show so how would they know to change the rating for just one episode?
No, live programs do not always have their scripts preapproved. But nonadherence to specified guidelines can result in hefty penalties and fines, and a continuous pattern of disregard could lead to cancellation or even a complete revocation of a broadcasting license.


besides they wouldnt change the rating for just one 2 min segment lol, dont act like you know everything about t.v. just because you have a job there im sure its possible for you to be wrong on some occasions even in a situation involving your chosen profesion.
This is patently false. If those 2 minutes feature content that deviates from the standard set by the rest of the show, that absolutely will change the rating of a show. Granted, the rating won't change in the middle of a live program, but it absolutely can lead to future installments reflecting a different rating based upon previous content.

And yes, it is possible for me to be wrong about certain aspects of my chosen profession, just as it's possible for someone to be wrong about certain aspects of a field that they demonstrably know nothing about. You're basing your assertions off of nothing more than conjecture and speculation, whereas my assertions are coming from a place of firsthand knowledge and practical experience. So, yeah, lol and all of that.

Sinliner
01-20-2011, 03:39 AM
No, live programs do not always have their scripts preapproved. But nonadherence to specified guidelines can result in hefty penalties and fines, and a continuous pattern of disregard could lead to cancellation or even a complete revocation of a broadcasting license.


This is patently false. If those 2 minutes feature content that deviates from the standard set by the rest of the show, that absolutely will change the rating of a show. Granted, the rating won't change in the middle of a live program, but it absolutely can lead to future installments reflecting a different rating based upon previous content.

And yes, it is possible for me to be wrong about certain aspects of my chosen profession, just as it's possible for someone to be wrong about certain aspects of a field that they demonstrably know nothing about. You're basing your assertions off of nothing more than conjecture and speculation, whereas my assertions are coming from a place of firsthand knowledge and practical experience. So, yeah, lol and all of that.

I think youve lost the point of my whole argument, does having more than 1 sub-rating raise your rating? go consult your handbook.
And next time your having a discusion with another person try to stop your main focus being 'ive gotta be right' i promise it will make it much more enjoyable for you and other people.

Iron Ape
01-20-2011, 05:43 AM
I think youve lost the point of my whole argument, does having more than 1 sub-rating raise your rating? go consult your handbook.
And next time your having a discusion with another person try to stop your main focus being 'ive gotta be right' i promise it will make it much more enjoyable for you and other people.
As opposed to your focus of "you've gotta be wrong"? Yeah, pots and kettles and all of that.

If conversing with me is really that difficult for you, you always have the option available of just not talking to me. Might I suggest you try giving that spin.

SaberToothTigerz
01-20-2011, 06:20 AM
little kids are gonna start laughing at daniel bryan for not loosing his virginity
can u imagine kids at the age of 5 going all like
"hehehehe he is still a virgin HAHA , hey dad what's a virgin?"

SilverGhost
01-20-2011, 12:17 PM
little kids are gonna start laughing at daniel bryan for not loosing his virginity
can u imagine kids at the age of 5 going all like
"hehehehe he is still a virgin HAHA , hey dad what's a virgin?"

"Your future if you keep watching this crap son.....your future."

TheBeardOfZeus
01-20-2011, 12:42 PM
I don't mind the angle, and its shown here in the UK and we can be quite picky with stuff like this.

And i think we all learned a valuable lesson here, dont mess with The Ape.

el gabo
01-20-2011, 12:46 PM
I don't mind the angle, and its shown here in the UK and we can be quite picky with stuff like this.

And i think we all learned a valuable lesson here, dont mess with The Ape.

The Ape has never been proven wrong. Ever...

TheBeardOfZeus
01-20-2011, 12:49 PM
The Ape has never been proven wrong. Ever...

Exactly, and tbh it's good to have someone knowledgeable here.

And it's even better when people try to prove him wrong.

The Brown One
01-20-2011, 03:32 PM
Exactly, and tbh it's good to have someone knowledgeable here.

And it's even better when people try to prove him wrong.

Its sad that people have to start an argument with him, and use profanity, instead of only discussing the wrestling topic at hand.